Rather,

<<what

<<do you have

<<to say?

<<“the tenth,”

<<a certain one,

<<said

<<the Torah,

<<and not

<<a tenth

<<that is doubtful.

<<Here too:

<<“the tenth,”

<<a certain one,

<<said

<<the Torah,

<<and not

<<a tenth

<<that is doubtful.

Rav Acha of Difti said to Ravina:

<<what are

<<“the doubtful ones”?

<<If you say

<<doubtful

<<firstborns —

<<“it shall be

<<holy,”

<<said

<<the Torah,

<<and not

<<what is already

<<holy.

Rather,

<<a doubtful

<<redemption of

<<a firstborn

<<donkey,

<<and like Rav Nachman's [teaching];

<<for Rav Nachman said in the name of Rabba bar Avuha:

<<a Jew

<<who has

<<ten

<<doubtful

<<firstborn

<<donkeys

<<in

<<his house

<<separates

<<for them

<<ten

<<lambs,

<<and tithes them,

<<and they are

<<his.

What came of it,

<<of the bathhouse?

<<Come and hear,

<<for Rabbi Chiya bar Avin said:

<<there was

<<a case

<<in the court of

<<Rav Chisda,

<<and Rav Chisda

<<in the court of

<<Rav Huna,

<<and he resolved it

<<from this

<<that Rav Nachman said:

<<any

<<money

<<that one cannot

<<extract

<<through judges,

<<if he consecrated it,

<<it is not

<<consecrated.

But

<<if he can

<<extract it

<<through judges,

<<if he consecrated it,

<<it is consecrated,

<<even though

<<that he did not

<<extract it.

<<But didn't Rabbi Yochanan say:

<<if one robbed

<<and did not

<<despair

<<the owners —

<<both of them

<<are not

<<able

<<to consecrate it:

<<this one

<<because

<<it is not

<<his,

<<and that one

<<because

<<it is not

<<in his possession!

Do

<<you think

<<with a bathhouse of

<<movables

<<we are dealing?

<<With a bathhouse of

<<land

<<we are dealing,

<<where since

<<he can

<<extract it

<<through judges,

<<in his possession

<<it stands.

Taught

<<Rav Tachlifa of the West

<<before

<<Rabbi Abahu:

<<two

<<grasping

<<a garment —

<<this one

<<takes

<<up to

<<the place

<<that his hand

<<reaches,

<<and that one

<<takes

<<up to

<<the place

<<that his hand

<<reaches,

<<and the rest

<<they divide

<<equally.

<<Gestured

<<to him

<<Rabbi Abahu:

<<and with an oath.

But

<<our Mishnah,

<<which teaches

<<that they divide

<<with each other,

<<and does not

<<teach

<<this one

<<takes

<<up to

<<the place

<<that his hand

<<reaches —

<<how

<<do you find it?

<<Rav Pappa said:

<<where they hold

<<the fringe.

Rav Mesharshiya said:

<<learn from it:

<<this

<<cloth —

<<since

<<he holds

<<of it

<<three

<<by

<<three,

<<we read

<<about it:

<<“and he gave

<<to his fellow.”

For like one

<<that is cut off

<<it is,

<<and he acquires.

And how is it different

<<from Rav Chisda's [ruling]?

<<For Rav Chisda said:

<<a get

<<in her hand

<<and a string

<<in his hand —

<<if

<<he can

<<pull it away

<<and bring it

<<to himself,

<<she is not

<<divorced;

<<and if

<<not,

<<she is divorced!

There

<<a severance

<<we require,

<<and there is none;

<<here

<<a giving

<<we require,

<<and there

<<is.

Rava said:

<<if

<<was

<<the garment

<<gilded,

<<they divide.

<<Obviously!

<<It is necessary only

<<where stands

<<the gold

<<in the

<<middle.

This

<<too

<<is obvious!

<<It is necessary only

<<where it is nearer

<<to

<<one of them.

<<Lest you say:

<<that he says

<<to him:

<<divide

<<this way;

<<it teaches us

<<that he says

<<to him:

<<what

<<did you see

<<that you divide

<<this way?

<<Divide

<<that way.

The Rabbis taught:

<<two

<<grasping

<<a document —

<<the lender

<<says:

<<mine

<<it is,

<<and it fell

<<from me

<<and I found it;

<<and the borrower

<<says:

<<yours

<<it was,

<<and I repaid it

<<to you —

<<let be verified

<<the document

<<by its signatories —

<<the words of

<<Rebbi.

Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel

<<says:

<<they divide.

If it fell

<<into the hand of

<<a judge —

<<he shall not

<<take it out

<<ever.

<<Rabbi Yosei

<<says:

<<it

<<remains

<<in its presumed status.

Said

<<the master:

<<let be verified

<<the document

<<by its signatories

<<and collects

<<with it

<<the lender

<<all of it.

<<And does he not hold of

<<our Mishnah:

<<two

<<who are holding

<<etc.!

Rava said in the name of Rav Nachman:

<<with a verified [document]

<<all agree

<<they divide;

<<where

<<they disagree is

<<with one that is not

<<verified.

Rebbi

<<holds:

<<one who admits

<<to a document

<<that he wrote it

<<must

<<verify it;

<<and if

<<he verifies

<<it

<<he divides,

<<and if

<<not

<<he verifies

<<it

<<he does not

<<divide.

What is the reason?

<<A shard

<<merely

<<it is;

<<who

<<makes

<<it,

<<this

<<document?

<<The borrower,

<<and he

<<says

<<that it is repaid.

And Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel

<<holds:

<<one who admits

<<to a document

<<that he wrote it

<<need not

<<verify it;

<<and even though

<<that he does not

<<verify

<<it,

<<they divide.

“If it fell

<<into the hand of

<<a judge

<<he shall not

<<take it out

<<ever.”