that has reached

<<the shoulders;

<<here

<<with an improvement

<<that has not

<<reached

<<the shoulders.

But

<<there were cases

<<every

<<day,

<<and collected

<<Shmuel

<<even

<<for an improvement

<<that has reached

<<the shoulders!

It is not

<<difficult:

<<this

<<is where he is owed

<<by him

<<the measure of

<<the land

<<and the improvement;

<<this

<<is where he is not

<<owed

<<by him

<<but

<<the measure of

<<the land,

<<that he gives

<<him

<<his improvement

<<and removes

<<him.

It is well

<<according to the one

<<who says:

<<if

<<he has

<<money —

<<the buyer —

<<he cannot

<<remove

<<him —

<<the creditor —

<<well.

<<But

<<according to the one

<<who says

<<when

<<he has

<<money —

<<the buyer —

<<he can

<<remove

<<him —

<<the creditor —

<<let him say

<<to him:

<<if

<<I had

<<money,

<<I would

<<remove you

<<from all

<<the land;

<<now

<<that I have no

<<money,

<<give

<<me

<<a griva

<<of land

<<(in land)

<<[in this land]

<<the measure of

<<my improvement!

Here with what are we dealing?

<<Such as

<<where he made it

<<an apotiki,

<<for he said

<<to him:

<<not

<<shall there be

<<for you

<<repayment

<<except

<<from this.

If he recognized

<<about it

<<that it was not

<<his

<<and bought it —

<<Rav said:

<<the money

<<he has,

<<the improvement

<<he has not.

<<And Shmuel

<<said:

<<even

<<the money

<<he has not.

In what do they disagree?

<<Rav

<<holds:

<<a person

<<knows

<<that land

<<he does not have,

<<and he resolved

<<and gave

<<for the purpose of

<<a deposit.

<<But let him say

<<to him

<<for the purpose of

<<a deposit!

<<He thinks

<<he will not

<<accept it.

And Shmuel

<<holds:

<<a person

<<knows

<<that land

<<he does not have,

<<and he resolved

<<and gave

<<for the purpose of

<<a gift.

<<But let him say

<<to him

<<for the purpose of

<<a gift!

<<It is embarrassing

<<to him —

<<the matter.

But

<<they disagreed

<<about it

<<one

<<time,

<<for it was stated:

<<one who betroths

<<his sister —

<<Rav

<<said:

<<the money

<<returns;

<<and Shmuel

<<said:

<<the money

<<is a gift.

<<Rav

<<said:

<<the money

<<returns —

<<a person

<<knows

<<that do not

<<betrothals

<<take hold

<<with his sister,

<<and he resolved

<<and gave

<<for the purpose of

<<a deposit.

<<But let him say

<<to her

<<for the purpose of

<<a deposit!

<<He thinks

<<she will not

<<accept it

<<from him.

And Shmuel

<<said:

<<the money

<<is a gift —

<<a person

<<knows

<<that do not

<<betrothals

<<take hold

<<with his sister,

<<and he resolved

<<and gave

<<for the purpose of

<<a gift.

<<But let him say

<<to her

<<for the purpose of

<<a gift!

<<It is embarrassing

<<to her —

<<the matter.

It is necessary:

<<for if

<<it had been stated

<<in this one,

<<in this one

<<says it

<<Rav,

<<for not

<<do

<<people

<<give

<<gifts

<<to a stranger.

<<But

<<regarding

<<his sister

<<I might say

<<he concedes

<<to him

<<— to Shmuel.

And if

<<it had been stated

<<in that one,

<<in that one

<<says it

<<Shmuel;

<<but

<<in this one

<<I might say

<<he concedes

<<to him

<<— to Rav.

<<Therefore it is necessary.

Whether

<<according to Rav

<<who says

<<a deposit,

<<or

<<according to Shmuel

<<who says

<<a gift —

<<this one,

<<into the land

<<by what

<<did he descend,

<<and the produce

<<how

<<does he eat?

He thinks:

<<I

<<will descend

<<into the land

<<and work

<<and eat

<<in it

<<just as

<<he would

<<have done

<<himself;

<<when

<<comes

<<the owner

<<of the land,

<<my money

<<will be —

<<according to Rav

<<who says

<<a deposit,

<<a deposit;

<<according to Shmuel

<<who says

<<a gift,

<<a gift.

Rava said:

<<the halachah is:

<<he has

<<the money

<<and he has

<<the improvement,

<<and even though

<<he did not

<<specify

<<to him

<<the improvement.

<<If he recognized

<<about it

<<that it was not

<<his

<<and bought it —

<<the money

<<he has,

<<the improvement

<<he has not.

A lien

<<is an error of

<<the scribe

<<it is,

<<whether

<<in documents of

<<loan

<<or

<<in documents of

<<buying

<<and selling.

Asked of him

<<Shmuel

<<of Rav:

<<if he went back

<<and bought it

<<from the owners

<<the first —

<<what is it?

<<He said to him:

<<what

<<did sell

<<to him

<<the first

<<to the second?

<<Every

<<right

<<that will come

<<to his hand.

What is the reason?

<<Mar Zutra

<<said:

<<he is content

<<that they not

<<call him

<<a robber.

<<Rav Ashi

<<said:

<<he is content

<<that he stand

<<in his faithfulness.

What is between them?

<<There is between them

<<where died

<<the buyer:

<<the one

<<who says

<<he is content

<<that they not

<<call him

<<a robber