There

<<we learned:

<<“but

<<not

<<the storehouse,”

<<And Shmuel said:

<<What is

<<“but

<<not

<<the storehouse”?

<<But

<<not

<<may he finish

<<the storehouse

<<entirely,

<<lest

<<he come

<<to level

<<pits.

<<Here,

<<what?

There

<<it is

<<on Shabbos

<<that it is prohibited,

<<because

<<it is severe;

<<but

<<Yom Tov,

<<which is lenient,

<<it is fine.

<<Or perhaps:

<<there,

<<where there is

<<neglect of

<<the study hall

<<you say

<<no;

<<here,

<<where there is no

<<neglect of

<<the study hall

<<how much more so!

And here

<<we learned:

<<one may lower

<<produce

<<through

<<a skylight

<<on Yom Tov;

<<And Rav Nachman said:

<<they taught this only

<<on the same

<<roof,

<<but

<<from roof

<<to roof,

<<no.

<<This is also taught:

<<one may not

<<move [things]

<<from roof

<<to roof,

<<even

<<when their roofs

<<are level.

There,

<<what?

<<(All the more so

<<Shabbos,

<<which is severe;

<<or perhaps:)

<<here

<<it is

<<that it is prohibited,

<<because

<<Yom Tov

<<is lenient

<<and he will come

<<to treat lightly

<<it;

<<but

<<Shabbos,

<<which is severe

<<and not

<<will he come

<<to treat lightly

<<it —

<<it is fine.

Or perhaps:

<<just as

<<here,

<<where there is

<<loss of

<<produce,

<<you say

<<no;

<<there,

<<where there is no

<<loss of

<<produce,

<<how much more so!

Here

<<(we learned):

<<he may not

<<let them down

<<with a rope

<<through windows,

<<nor

<<bring them down

<<by way of

<<ladders.

<<There,

<<what?

<<Here

<<on Yom Tov

<<it is

<<that it is prohibited,

<<where there is no

<<neglect of

<<the study hall

<<but

<<Shabbos,

<<where there is

<<neglect of

<<the study hall

<<it is fine.

Or perhaps:

<<here,

<<where there is

<<loss of

<<produce,

<<you say

<<no;

<<there,

<<where there is no

<<loss of

<<produce,

<<how much more so!

<<Let it stand [unresolved].

“And one may cover

<<produce.”

<<Ulla said:

<<and even

<<a stack

<<of bricks.

<<Rabbi Yitzchak

<<said:

<<produce

<<that is fit.

<<And follows

<<Rabbi Yitzchak

<<his reasoning,

<<for Rabbi Yitzchak said:

<<not

<<a vessel

<<is moved

<<except

<<for something

<<that may be moved

<<on Shabbos.

We learned:

<<one may cover

<<produce

<<with vessels.

<<Produce,

<<yes;

<<a stack

<<of bricks,

<<no!

<<The same applies

<<that even

<<a stack

<<of bricks;

<<and since

<<it taught

<<in the first clause

<<“one may lower

<<produce,”

<<it taught

<<in the latter clause

<<also

<<“one may cover

<<produce.”

We learned:

<<and likewise

<<jugs of

<<wine

<<and likewise

<<jugs of

<<oil!

<<Here, with what are we dealing?

<<With untithed [produce].

So too

<<it stands to reason,

<<for if

<<it enters your mind

<<jugs of

<<wine

<<and jugs of

<<oil

<<that are permitted,

<<but

<<he taught

<<in the first clause

<<produce!

Jugs of

<<wine

<<and jugs of

<<oil

<<were necessary for him;

<<it might enter your mind to say:

<<about a loss

<<that is large

<<they were concerned,

<<about a loss

<<that is small

<<not

<<were they concerned;

<<it teaches us [otherwise].

We learned:

<<one may place

<<a vessel

<<under

<<the leak

<<on Shabbos.

<<With a leak

<<that is fit [to drink].

Come and hear:

<<one may spread

<<a mat

<<over

<<bricks

<<on Shabbos!

<<That were left over

<<from a building,

<<which are fit

<<to recline

<<on them.

Come and hear:

<<one may spread

<<a mat

<<over

<<stones

<<on Shabbos!

<<With stones

<<that are rounded,

<<which are fit

<<for the bathroom.

Come and hear:

<<one may spread

<<a mat

<<over

<<a hive of

<<bees

<<on Shabbos —

<<in the sun

<<because of

<<the sun,

<<and in the rain

<<because of

<<the rain —

<<provided

<<that not

<<he intend

<<to trap!

<<There

<<too

<<there is

<<honey.

Rav Ukva of Meishan said to Rav Ashi:

<<This works

<<in the days of

<<summer,

<<when there is

<<honey;

<<in the days of

<<the rains,

<<what is there to say?

<<It is necessary only

<<for those

<<two

<<combs.

<<Those

<<two

<<combs

<<are muktzeh!

<<Here, with what are we dealing?

<<Where he intended

<<them [for eating].

But

<<if not

<<he intended

<<them,

<<what?

<<It is prohibited?

<<Instead of teaching

<<“provided

<<that not

<<he intend

<<to trap,”

<<let it distinguish

<<and teach

<<within the case itself:

<<In what case is this said?

<<Where he intended

<<them;

<<but

<<if not

<<he intended

<<them,

<<it is prohibited!

This is what it means:

<<even though

<<he intended

<<them,

<<provided

<<that not

<<he intend

<<to trap.

With what

<<did you establish it?

<<Like Rabbi Yehuda,

<<who holds of

<<muktzeh.

<<Say the latter clause:

<<provided

<<that not

<<he intend

<<to trap —

<<we have come

<<to Rabbi Shimon,

<<who said:

<<something

<<that one does not

<<intend

<<is permitted!

And do you understand it

<<as Rabbi Shimon?

<<But

<<Abaye

<<and Rava

<<both say:

<<agrees

<<Rabbi Shimon

<<with “cut off its head

<<and will it not die?”!

Actually,

<<all of it

<<Rabbi Yehuda

<<it is,

<<and here, with what are we dealing?

<<Where there are in it

<<openings.

<<And not

<<say

<<according to Rabbi Yehuda:

<<“provided

<<that not

<<he intend

<<to trap,”