But is it not so that

<<its remainder

<<returns,

<<and we have heard

<<that Rabbi Eliezer

<<said:

<<wherever

<<its remainder

<<returns,

<<it does not

<<fix!

As we learned:

<<one who takes

<<olives

<<from

<<the vat

<<dips

<<one at a time

<<in salt

<<and eats.

<<And if

<<he dipped

<<and placed

<<before him

<<ten,

<<he is obligated.

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<says:

<<from

<<a vat

<<that is pure,

<<he is obligated;

<<from

<<a vat

<<that is impure,

<<he is exempt,

<<because

<<he

<<returns

<<the remainder.

And we discussed it:

<<how is different

<<the first clause,

<<and how is different

<<the latter clause?

<<And Rabbi Abahu said:

<<the first clause is

<<with a vat

<<that is pure

<<and a man

<<who is impure,

<<who cannot

<<return it.

The latter clause is

<<with a vat

<<that is impure

<<and a man

<<who is impure,

<<who can

<<return it.

Our Mishnah

<<too is

<<with drying produce

<<that is pure

<<and a man

<<who is impure,

<<who cannot

<<return it.

<<But are they not

<<returned

<<and standing!

Rather,

<<Rav Shimi bar Ashi said:

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<are you citing?

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<follows his reasoning,

<<who said:

<<terumah

<<fixes,

<<and all the more so

<<Shabbos.

<<As we learned:

<<produce

<<from which he separated terumah

<<before

<<was completed

<<their processing —

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<prohibits

<<eating

<<from them

<<casually,

<<and the Sages

<<permit.

Come and hear

<<from the latter clause:

<<and the Sages

<<say:

<<not until

<<he marks [it]

<<and says:

<<“from here

<<until

<<here.”

<<The reason is

<<that it is the eve of Shabbos

<<in the Sabbatical year,

<<which is not

<<subject to

<<tithing

<<it is;

<<but

<<in the other

<<years of

<<the seven-year cycle,

<<which are subject to

<<tithing

<<they are,

<<they are prohibited.

<<What is the reason?

<<Is it not

<<because

<<Shabbos

<<fixes?

No;

<<different is

<<there:

<<since

<<he said

<<“from here

<<until

<<here

<<I

<<will eat

<<tomorrow,”

<<he fixed it.

<<If so,

<<why specifically

<<Shabbos?

<<Even

<<on a weekday

<<as well!

<<This

<<is what it teaches us:

<<that untithed produce

<<is prepared

<<for

<<Shabbos,

<<so that if

<<he transgressed

<<and fixed it,

<<it is fixed.

And they contrasted it:

<<if he was

<<eating

<<from a cluster [of grapes]

<<and entered

<<from a garden

<<to a courtyard —

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<says:

<<he may finish;

<<Rabbi Yehoshua

<<says:

<<he may not

<<finish.

If it grew dark

<<on the night of

<<Shabbos —

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<says:

<<he may finish;

<<Rabbi Yehoshua

<<says:

<<he may not

<<finish!

There,

<<as it teaches

<<the reason:

<<Rabbi Nasan

<<says:

<<not

<<when said

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<“he may finish”

<<in the courtyard

<<does he finish,

<<but rather

<<he goes out

<<outside

<<the courtyard

<<and finishes;

<<and not

<<when said

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<“he may finish”

<<on Shabbos

<<does he finish,

<<but rather

<<he waits

<<until the conclusion of Shabbos

<<and finishes.

When

<<came

<<Ravin,

<<he said

<<[that] Rabbi Yochanan [said]:

<<whether

<<Shabbos,

<<or

<<terumah,

<<or

<<a courtyard,

<<or

<<a purchase —

<<all of them

<<do not

<<fix

<<except

<<with something

<<that was completed

<<its processing.

Shabbos —

<<to exclude

<<from Hillel,

<<as it is taught:

<<one who bundles

<<produce

<<from place

<<to place

<<to harvest,

<<and sanctified

<<upon them

<<the day —

<<Rabbi Yehuda said:

<<Hillel

<<alone

<<prohibits.