but

<<where

<<there is not

<<a spade

<<stuck [in the ground],

<<no.

<<Alternatively:

<<until here

<<do not

<<say

<<Beis Hillel

<<here

<<except

<<since

<<muktzeh

<<it is,

<<standing

<<and saying

<<this one

<<and this one

<<I

<<will take

<<suffices;

<<but

<<there,

<<no.

Rather,

<<if there is a difficulty,

<<this is the difficulty:

<<Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<take

<<the pestle

<<to chop

<<on it

<<meat,

<<and Beis Hillel

<<permit.

<<Apparently,

<<regarding

<<the rejoicing of

<<Yom Tov,

<<Beis Shammai

<<are stringent

<<and Beis Hillel

<<lenient;

<<but contrast it:

<<one who slaughters

<<an undomesticated animal

<<or a bird —

<<Beis Shammai

<<etc.!

<<Rabbi Yochanan said:

<<reversed

<<is the attribution.

From where [do you know]?

<<Perhaps

<<it is not so:

<<until here

<<do not

<<say

<<Beis Shammai

<<there

<<except

<<where

<<there is

<<a spade

<<stuck [in the ground],

<<but

<<where

<<there is not

<<a spade

<<stuck [in the ground],

<<no;

<<alternatively:

<<until here

<<do not

<<say

<<Beis Hillel

<<here

<<except

<<because there is

<<the status of

<<a vessel

<<on it;

<<but

<<there,

<<no.

Rather,

<<if there is a difficulty,

<<this is the difficulty:

<<Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<place

<<the hide

<<before

<<those who tread [it],

<<and one may not

<<lift it

<<unless

<<there is

<<on it

<<an olive's bulk of

<<meat.

<<And Beis Hillel

<<permit.

Apparently,

<<regarding

<<the rejoicing of

<<Yom Tov,

<<Beis Shammai

<<are stringent

<<and Beis Hillel

<<lenient;

<<but contrast it:

<<one who slaughters

<<an undomesticated animal

<<or a bird

<<on Yom Tov

<<etc.

<<Rabbi Yochanan said:

<<reversed

<<is the attribution.

From where [do you know]?

<<Perhaps

<<it is not so:

<<until here

<<do not

<<say

<<Beis Shammai

<<there

<<except

<<where

<<there is

<<a spade

<<stuck [in the ground],

<<but

<<where

<<there is not

<<a spade

<<stuck [in the ground],

<<no;

<<alternatively:

<<until here

<<do not

<<say

<<Beis Hillel

<<here

<<except

<<because it is fit

<<to recline

<<on it;

<<but

<<there,

<<no.

Rather,

<<if there is a difficulty,

<<this is the difficulty:

<<Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<remove

<<the shutters

<<on Yom Tov,

<<and Beis Hillel

<<permit

<<even

<<returning [them].

<<Apparently,

<<regarding

<<the rejoicing of

<<Yom Tov,

<<Beis Shammai

<<are stringent

<<and Beis Hillel

<<lenient;

<<but contrast it:

<<one who slaughters

<<an undomesticated animal

<<or a bird

<<on Yom Tov

<<etc.

Granted,

<<Beis Shammai

<<against Beis Shammai

<<is not a difficulty:

<<there

<<there is

<<a spade

<<stuck [in the ground];

<<here

<<there is not

<<a spade

<<stuck [in the ground].

<<But

<<Beis Hillel

<<against Beis Hillel

<<is difficult!

Rabbi Yochanan said:

<<reversed

<<is the attribution.

<<(Alternatively:)

<<until here

<<do not

<<say

<<Beis Hillel

<<here

<<except

<<because

<<there is no

<<building

<<with vessels

<<and there is no

<<demolition

<<with vessels;

<<but

<<there,

<<no.

MISHNAH:

<<Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<take [pigeons]

<<unless

<<he shook [them]

<<while it was still day.

<<And Beis Hillel

<<say:

<<he stands

<<and says:

<<‘this one

<<and this one

<<I

<<will take.’

GEMARA:

<<Rav Chanan bar Ami said:

<<the dispute is

<<about a brood

<<first,

<<for Beis Shammai

<<hold:

<<we decree,

<<lest

<<he come

<<to reconsider;

and Beis Hillel

<<hold:

<<we do not

<<decree.

<<But

<<about a brood

<<second,

<<all agree

<<standing

<<and saying

<<‘this one

<<and this one

<<I

<<will take’

<<suffices.

And Beis Hillel —

<<why does he need

<<to say

<<‘this one

<<and this one

<<I

<<will take’?

<<Let him say:

<<‘from here

<<I

<<will take

<<tomorrow’!

And if you say

<<Beis Hillel

<<do not hold of

<<retroactive clarification,

<<but we learned:

<<a corpse

<<in a house

<<which has

<<doorways

<<many —

<<all of them

<<are impure.

If was opened

<<one

<<of them,

<<it

<<is impure,

<<and all of them

<<are pure.

<<If he intended

<<to take it out

<<through one

<<of them,

<<or

<<through a window

<<that has

<<four

<<by

<<four [handbreadths],

<<it saves

<<all

<<the doorways

<<entirely.

Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<provided

<<that he intended

<<to take it out

<<before

<<died

<<the deceased;

<<and Beis Hillel

<<say:

<<even

<<after died

<<the deceased.

But

<<it was stated

<<about it:

<<Rabba said:

<<to render pure

<<the doorways

<<from here on.

<<And similarly

<<Rabbi Oshaya said:

<<to render pure

<<the doorways

<<from here on.

<<From here on,

<<yes;

<<retroactively,

<<no.

Rava

<<said:

<<actually,

<<retroactively;

<<and here

<<this is

<<the reason:

<<lest

<<he move [one]

<<and leave [it],

<<move [another]

<<and leave [it],

<<and he will be moving

<<something

<<that is not

<<fit for him.

But

<<you said:

<<standing

<<and saying

<<‘this one

<<and this one

<<I

<<will take’

<<suffices!

<<These things apply

<<on the eve of Yom Tov,