for

<<kindling.

He said to him:

<<go out,

<<teach [it]

<<outside;

<<kindling

<<and cooking

<<is not

<<a Mishnah.

<<And if you should say

<<it is a Mishnah,

<<Beis Shammai

<<it is,

<<who say:

<<we do not

<<say:

<<since

<<was permitted

<<carrying

<<for a need,

<<it was permitted

<<also

<<not for a need;

<<here

<<too,

<<we do not

<<say:

<<since

<<was permitted

<<kindling

<<for a need,

<<it was permitted

<<also

<<not for a need.

For if

<<Beis Hillel —

<<since

<<they say:

<<since

<<was permitted

<<carrying

<<for a need,

<<it was permitted

<<also

<<not for a need,

<<here

<<too:

<<since

<<was permitted

<<kindling

<<for a need,

<<it was permitted

<<also

<<not for a need.

MISHNAH:

<<Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<bring

<<challah

<<and the gifts

<<to the kohen

<<on Yom Tov,

<<whether

<<they were separated

<<yesterday

<<or

<<they were separated

<<today;

<<and Beis Hillel

<<permit.

Said

<<to them

<<Beis Shammai:

<<[it is] an analogy:

<<challah

<<and the gifts

<<are a gift

<<to the kohen,

<<and terumah

<<is a gift

<<to the kohen;

<<just as

<<one may not

<<bring

<<terumah,

<<so

<<one may not

<<bring

<<the gifts.

Said

<<to them

<<Beis Hillel:

<<No;

<<if

<<you said [so]

<<of terumah,

<<which one is not

<<permitted

<<to separate [today],

<<will you say [so]

<<of the gifts,

<<which one is permitted

<<to separate [today]?

GEMARA:

<<It enters your mind [to say]:

<<that were separated

<<today

<<and that were slaughtered

<<today,

<<and that were separated

<<yesterday

<<and that were slaughtered

<<yesterday.

<<Whose is

<<our Mishnah?

<<Not

<<Rabbi Yosei

<<and not

<<Rabbi Yehuda,

<<but

<<Others.

<<As it is taught:

<<Rabbi Yehuda said:

<<did not

<<disagree

<<Beis Shammai

<<and Beis Hillel

<<about

<<the gifts

<<that were separated

<<on the eve of Yom Tov,

<<that one may bring [them]

<<with

<<the gifts

<<that were separated

<<today

<<and slaughtered

<<today;

<<they did not

<<disagree

<<except

<<about bringing them

<<by themselves,

<<for Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<bring [them],

<<and Beis Hillel

<<say:

<<one may bring [them].

And thus

<<would

<<Beis Shammai

<<reason:

<<challah

<<and the gifts

<<are a gift

<<to the kohen,

<<and terumah

<<is a gift

<<to the kohen;

<<just as

<<one may not

<<bring

<<terumah,

<<so

<<one may not

<<bring

<<the gifts.

<<Said

<<to them

<<Beis Hillel:

<<No;

<<if

<<you said [so]

<<of terumah,

<<which one is not

<<permitted

<<to separate [today],

<<will you say [so]

<<of the gifts,

<<which one is permitted

<<to separate [today]?

Rabbi Yosei said:

<<did not

<<disagree

<<Beis Shammai

<<and Beis Hillel

<<about

<<the gifts,

<<that one may bring [them];

<<they did not

<<disagree

<<except

<<about

<<terumah,

<<for Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<bring [it],

<<and Beis Hillel

<<say:

<<one may bring [it].

<<And thus

<<would

<<Beis Hillel

<<reason:

<<challah

<<and the gifts

<<are a gift

<<to the kohen,

<<and terumah

<<is a gift

<<to the kohen;

<<just as

<<one may bring

<<the gifts,

<<so

<<one may bring

<<terumah.

<<Said

<<to them

<<Beis Shammai:

<<No;

<<if

<<you said [so]

<<of the gifts,

<<which one is permitted

<<to separate [today],

<<will you say [so]

<<of terumah,

<<which one is not

<<permitted

<<to separate [today]?!

Others

<<say:

<<did not

<<disagree

<<Beis Shammai

<<and Beis Hillel

<<about

<<terumah,

<<that one may not

<<bring [it];

<<they did not

<<disagree

<<except

<<about

<<the gifts,

<<for Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<one may not

<<bring [them],

<<and Beis Hillel

<<say:

<<one may bring [them].

<<Shall we say

<<Others

<<it is,

<<and not

<<Rabbi Yehuda?

Rava said:

<<does

<<it teach

<<‘that were separated

<<today

<<and slaughtered

<<today’?

<<‘That were separated’

<<it teaches,

<<and actually

<<their slaughter was

<<yesterday.

<<Shall we say

<<Rabbi Yehuda

<<it is,

<<and not

<<Others!

<<You may even say

<<Others,

<<and [it speaks] about those

<<that were slaughtered

<<yesterday.

If so,

<<that is the same as

<<Rabbi Yehuda!

<<There is

<<between them

<<[gifts] brought along.

Rav Yehuda said in the name of Shmuel:

<<the halacha is

<<like Rabbi Yosei.

<<Rav Tovi

<<son

<<of Rav Nechemya

<<had

<<a jug

<<of wine

<<of terumah;

<<he came

<<before

<<Rav Yosef;

<<he said to him:

<<what is [the law]

<<to bring [it]

<<to a kohen

<<today?

<<He said to him:

<<thus

<<Rav Yehuda said in the name of Shmuel:

<<the halacha is

<<like Rabbi Yosei.

The host

<<of Rava bar Rav Chanan

<<had

<<bundles

<<of mustard [stalks];

<<he said to him:

<<what is [the law]

<<to crumble [them]

<<and eat

<<from them

<<on Yom Tov?

<<Not

<<was it

<<in his hand [to answer];

<<he came

<<before

<<Rava.

<<He said to him:

<<one may rub

<<ears of grain

<<and crumble

<<legumes

<<on Yom Tov.

Raised an objection to him

<<Abaye:

<<one who rubs

<<ears of grain

<<on Shabbos eve —

<<the next day

<<he blows [the chaff]

<<from hand

<<to hand

<<and eats;

<<but

<<not

<<with a basket

<<nor

<<with a bowl.

One who rubs

<<ears of grain

<<on the eve of Yom Tov —

<<the next day

<<he blows [the chaff]

<<a little at a time

<<and eats,

<<even

<<with a basket

<<and even

<<with a bowl;

<<but

<<not

<<with a board,

<<nor

<<with a sifter,

<<nor

<<with a sieve.

<<On the eve of Yom Tov,

<<yes;

<<on Yom Tov,

<<no!

You may even say

<<on Yom Tov;

<<and since

<<it taught

<<in the first clause

<<‘on Shabbos eve’,

<<it taught

<<in the latter clause

<<also

<<‘on the eve of Yom Tov’.

If so,

<<we have found

<<terumah

<<that one is permitted

<<to separate [today];

<<but we learned:

<<‘No;

<<if

<<you said [so]

<<of terumah,

<<which one is not

<<permitted

<<to separate [today]’

<<etc.!

It is not a difficulty: