he is flogged

<<once;

and a non-kohen

<<who ate it

<<is flogged

<<twice.

<<For had

<<at the outset

<<he eaten it,

<<he would not

<<be flogged

<<except

<<once.

The reason is

<<that he is

<<in Jerusalem;

<<but

<<in the outlying areas

<<he would be flogged

<<three,

<<even though

<<it had not

<<seen

<<the face of the wall!

<<Where he brought it in

<<and took it out.

If so,

<<what

<<is it to say?

<<Here

<<with what

<<are we dealing?

<<Such as

<<where he brought them in

<<in their tevel state,

<<and he holds:

<<gifts

<<that were not

<<separated

<<are as though

<<they were separated

<<considered.

And does hold

<<Rabbi Yosei

<<gifts

<<that were not

<<separated

<<are as though

<<they were separated

<<considered?

<<But it is taught:

<<Rabbi Shimon ben Yehuda

<<says

<<in the name of

<<Rabbi Yosei:

<<did not

<<disagree

<<Beis Shammai

<<and Beis Hillel

<<about

<<produce

<<whose was not

<<completed

<<its processing

<<and passed

<<through Jerusalem,

<<that may be redeemed

<<the second tithe

<<of theirs

<<and eaten

<<anywhere.

And about

<<what

<<did they disagree?

<<About

<<produce

<<whose was completed

<<its processing

<<and passed

<<through Jerusalem:

<<for Beis Shammai

<<say:

<<he must return

<<the second tithe

<<of theirs

<<and it is eaten

<<in Jerusalem;

<<and Beis Hillel

<<say:

<<it may be redeemed

<<and eaten

<<anywhere.

<<And if

<<it should enter your mind

<<gifts

<<that were not

<<separated

<<are as though

<<they were separated

<<considered —

<<but

<<have taken it in

<<the walls!

Rabba said:

<<the wall

<<for eating

<<is Torah law;

<<the wall

<<for taking in

<<is rabbinic.

<<And when

<<decreed

<<the Rabbis,

<<it was when

<<it is

<<in its own state;

<<in its tevel state

<<not

<<did decree

<<the Rabbis.

Ravina

<<said:

<<such as

<<where he holds

<<it

<<on a pole.

<<So resolve

<<the question

<<of Rav Pappa!

MISHNAH:

<<One who makes

<<a bald patch

<<on his head,

<<and one who rounds

<<the corners of

<<his head,

<<and one who destroys

<<the corners of

<<his beard,

<<and one who cuts

<<a cut

<<single

<<for

<<the dead —

<<is liable.

<<[If] he cut

<<a cut

<<single

<<for

<<five

<<dead,

<<or

<<five

<<cuts

<<for

<<a dead person

<<single —

<<he is liable

<<for

<<each and every one.

For

<<the head,

<<two:

<<one

<<from here

<<and one

<<from here;

<<for

<<the beard,

<<two

<<from here

<<and two

<<from here

<<and one

<<from below.

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<says:

<<if

<<were removed

<<all of them

<<at once,

<<he is not

<<liable

<<except

<<once.

And he is not

<<liable

<<until

<<he removes it

<<with a razor.

<<Rabbi Eliezer

<<says:

<<even

<<if he plucked it

<<with tweezers

<<or

<<with a plane

<<he is liable.

GEMARA:

<<The Rabbis taught:

<<‘they shall not

<<make bald’ —

<<one might think

<<even

<<if he made bald

<<four

<<or five

<<bald patches

<<he would not

<<be

<<liable

<<except

<<once?

<<The verse teaches:

<<‘a bald patch’ —

<<to make liable

<<for

<<each and every bald patch.

<<‘On their head’ —

<<what does the verse teach?

<<Because

<<it is said:

<<‘you shall not

<<cut yourselves

<<and you shall not

<<make

<<a bald patch

<<between

<<your eyes

<<for the dead,’

<<one might think

<<he would not

<<be

<<liable

<<except

<<for

<<between

<<the eyes

<<alone;

<<from where

<<to include

<<all

<<the head?

<<The verse teaches:

<<‘on their head’ —

<<to include

<<all

<<the head.

I have only

<<kohanim,

<<for included

<<for them

<<the verse

<<mitzvos

<<additional;

<<Israelites —

<<from where?

It is said

<<here

<<‘a bald patch’

<<and it is said

<<there

<<‘a bald patch’:

<<just as

<<there

<<he is liable

<<for

<<each and every bald patch,

<<and is liable

<<for

<<the head

<<as for between

<<the eyes,

<<so too

<<here

<<he is liable

<<for

<<each and every bald patch,

<<and is liable

<<for

<<the head

<<as for between

<<the eyes.

<<And just as

<<there

<<it is for

<<the dead,

<<so too

<<here

<<it is for

<<the dead.

These

<<four

<<or five

<<bald patches —

<<what are they like?

<<If you say

<<one after another,

<<and with five

<<warnings —

<<it is obvious!