from ‘his sister’

<<at the beginning [of the verse].

And the other:

<<that

<<is needed

<<to divide

<<kares

<<for the one who compounds

<<and the one who anoints.

And the other?

<<He holds

<<like Rabbi Elazar

<<[who] said

<<Rabbi Hoshaya [said],

<<for Rabbi Elazar said in the name of Rabbi Hoshaya:

<<everywhere

<<that you

<<find

<<two

<<prohibitions

<<and kares

<<one,

<<divided

<<they are

<<for an offering.

And if you wish, say:

<<not

<<does he hold it

<<like Rabbi Elazar,

<<and he derives it

<<from ‘and a man

<<who

<<lies

<<with a woman

<<who is unwell.’

And the other?

<<That

<<is needed

<<for that of Rabbi Yochanan,

<<for Rabbi Yochanan said

<<in the name of

<<Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai:

<<from where

<<that is not

<<the woman

<<impure

<<until

<<comes out

<<her flow

<<through

<<her private place?

<<As it is said:

<<‘and a man

<<who

<<lies

<<with a woman

<<who is unwell

<<and uncovers

<<her nakedness’

<<and so on —

<<this teaches

<<that is not

<<the woman

<<impure

<<until

<<comes out

<<her flow

<<through

<<her private place.

‘And the impure person

<<who ate

<<sacred food.’

<<Granted,

<<one who enters

<<the Temple

<<impure —

<<is written

<<the punishment

<<and is written

<<the warning:

<<the punishment,

<<as it is written:

<<‘the Tabernacle of

<<Hashem

<<he defiled

<<and shall be cut off’;

<<the warning:

<<‘and they shall not

<<defile

<<their camps.’

<<But

<<an impure person

<<who ate

<<sacred food —

<<granted,

<<‘the punishment’

<<is written:

<<‘and the soul

<<that

<<eats

<<meat

<<from the offering of

<<peace-offerings

<<that are

<<Hashem's

<<with his impurity

<<upon him

<<shall be cut off’;

<<but

<<the warning —

<<from where?

Reish Lakish

<<says:

<<‘anything

<<holy

<<she shall not

<<touch.’

Rabbi Yochanan

<<says —

<<taught

<<Bardela:

<<it is derived

<<‘his impurity’ from ‘his impurity’:

<<it is written

<<here:

<<‘with his impurity

<<upon him

<<shall be cut off,’

<<and it is written

<<there:

<<‘impure

<<he shall be,

<<still

<<his impurity

<<is upon him’ —

<<just as

<<there

<<[there is] punishment

<<and warning,

<<so too

<<here

<<punishment

<<and warning.

Granted,

<<Reish Lakish

<<does not

<<say

<<like Rabbi Yochanan —

<<the gezeirah shavah

<<he did not

<<receive.

<<But

<<Rabbi Yochanan —

<<what is the reason

<<he does not

<<say

<<like Reish Lakish?

<<He would say

<<to you:

<<that

<<is a warning

<<for terumah.

And Reish Lakish —

<<a warning

<<for terumah

<<from where does he derive it?

<<He derives it

<<from ‘any man

<<of the seed of

<<Aharon

<<who

<<is a metzora

<<or

<<a zav’ —

<<what

<<is it

<<a thing

<<that

<<is equal

<<in the seed

<<of

<<Aharon?

<<Hence

<<say:

<<this is

<<terumah.

<<And the other?

<<That

<<is for eating,

<<and this

<<is for touching.

And Reish Lakish —

<<this

<<‘anything

<<holy

<<she shall not

<<touch’ —

<<for this

<<is it that it comes?

<<That

<<is needed

<<for an impure person

<<who touched

<<sacred food!

<<For it was stated:

<<an impure person

<<who touched

<<sacred food —

<<Reish Lakish

<<says:

<<he is flogged;

<<Rabbi Yochanan

<<says:

<<he is not

<<flogged.

<<Reish Lakish

<<says:

<<he is flogged —

<<‘anything

<<holy

<<she shall not

<<touch.’

<<Rabbi Yochanan

<<says:

<<he is not

<<flogged —

<<that

<<is a warning

<<for terumah

<<that it comes!

An impure person

<<who touched

<<sacred food —

<<from the fact that expressed it

<<the Merciful One

<<in the language of

<<touching;

<<the warning

<<for one who eats —

<<is juxtaposed

<<sacred food

<<to the Temple.

And still,

<<for this

<<is it that it comes?

<<That

<<is needed

<<for an impure person

<<who ate

<<sacrificial meat

<<before

<<the sprinkling of the blood!

<<For it was stated:

<<an impure person

<<who ate

<<sacrificial meat

<<before

<<the sprinkling of the blood —

<<Reish Lakish

<<says:

<<he is flogged;

<<Rabbi Yochanan

<<says:

<<he is not

<<flogged.

Reish Lakish

<<says:

<<he is flogged —

<<‘anything

<<holy

<<she shall not

<<touch,’

<<it makes no difference

<<before

<<sprinkling

<<and it makes no difference

<<after

<<sprinkling.

<<Rabbi Yochanan

<<says:

<<he is not

<<flogged.

<<Rabbi Yochanan

<<follows his reasoning,

<<for said

<<the verse:

<<‘his impurity’ from ‘his impurity’;

<<and when

<<is written

<<‘his impurity,’

<<after

<<sprinkling

<<is it

<<written!

<<That one

<<from ‘anything holy’

<<is derived.

It is taught

<<in accordance with

<<Reish Lakish:

<<‘anything

<<holy

<<she shall not

<<touch’ —

<<a warning

<<for one who eats.

<<You

<<say

<<a warning

<<for one who eats,

<<or

<<is it not

<<rather

<<a warning

<<for one who touches?

<<The verse teaches:

<<‘anything

<<holy

<<she shall not

<<touch,

<<and into

<<the Temple’

<<and so on —

<<it juxtaposes

<<sacred food

<<to the Temple:

<<just as

<<the Temple

<<is a matter

<<that has

<<in it

<<the taking of life,

<<so too

<<any

<<matter

<<that has

<<in it

<<the taking of life.

<<And if

<<with touching —

<<is

<<there

<<the taking of life?

<<Rather,

<<with eating.

Rabba bar bar Chana said in the name of Rabbi Yochanan:

<<any

<<prohibition

<<that was preceded by

<<a positive commandment,

<<they flog

<<for it.